Thanks again for another informative article. The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. Ive shot numerous rolls of this film to test repairs Ive made to my cameras, but not very many on what Id consider serious work. allerdings wurden die Negative dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige. Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. A thorough article and greatly appreciated. Again, it is actually a 100 film and not a 200, but I like it better but it is not close to being in the same league as Kodak films by any stretch of the imagination. Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. These days Im only really developing my own film when I have certain requirements, like push processing, otherwise I wait until I have a large batch to send off to AG in Birmingham. ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? Ill tweak things in time and see if anything can be made to work better for me, but for now these are my opinions on each emulsion! AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. Aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde ich. Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. Personally though, as someone who accepts, even likes grain, and isnt averse to the look that youll get out of both of these films in Rodinol I am definitely thinking that the Fomapan offering will get a few more chances to impress. Ive even shot the movie at a World War 1 event at Torontos historic Fort York, and it looked amazing, especially when I framed the images right to avoid the modern condos surrounding the fort today. I love your city scenes. Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. Im here a bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. Thank you Victor! My negatives always look really dull. Ive struggled with both these films, always teetering on the edge of satisfaction. A lovely aesthetic, but definitely one to be controlled rather than allowed to get out of hand. The developer shouldnt matter too much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a Plustek 8100. Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. Thanks for taking the time to read this article! schrfe war nie ein Problem. Fomapan features a more severe cut off, with well exposed images showing pure blacks and pure whites with only a very same-y grey in the middle. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. https://emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. [], [] of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. Much brighter on the figure, much darker on areas not touched by light. Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. Kentmere 400, metered for the mid-tone. Go figure. What a difference! Lens: Mamiya-Sekor 65mm F3.5. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. This post was inspired by another I made back in the early days of my website, a post from October 2017 titled Kentmere 400 | Budget B&W Film. If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. Also, it seemed I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. See if you can guess which is which in the comments! I think the example shots in this article demonstrate this well.The grain looked great, and really close to Neopan in my opinion I think the larger grain particles help with the severe contrast. Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe (they are the same) are a good film with medium contrast. . So by exposing for the shadows, youre basically over exposing it 2-3 stops and thus placing the shadows off the toe and onto the linear part of the film curve? Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. Trees dont move. I develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the results, although, I just went back to HP5+. I see this as a good film for those who want to photograph historical events like World War Two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. ? Fomapan 200 suited me better. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. Ive never had an issue with a frame of film being too soft as a result of anything other than user error in terms of mis-focusing it. ILFORD HP5 PLUS vs Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 in the Moscow Metro with the Mamiya 7II Still life in lockdown: Yashica MAT-124 and Fomapan 200 Creative Trying out night photography with Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 The film meets high requirements for low granularity, good resolving power and good contour sharpness. That being said, settling on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren ergebnissen bringen knnen. These days, I primarily shoot 100 Classic, in large part because I use Fomapan a great deal in the testing of vintage cameras Ive repaired or restored, and their limited shutter speeds and apertures make it difficult to properly expose on a bright, sunny day with fast ISO 400 film. Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt mind it. Press?? Notice the bright spots on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through. Welche Zeiten hast du verwendet? Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. aber eigentlich wird das nix. Hopefully the results above prove me right. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Theres never a bad time to go out and shoot some film. Exposure: 1/500 @ F5.6 (Y2 filter and rubber lens hood) Film: Fomapan 200 Creative dev. These are terrific. Kodak prices, in particular, vary from one supplier to another, but as I write this Analogue Wonderland are selling Fomapan 400 for 4, Tri-X is 9.75 and T-Max 400 is 10.50. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. Can you talk about what developers you used? M3+50er Elmar auf Silvermax. If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. Theres any number of things I could try. I still prefer Tri-X but its a If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. By But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. Learn how your comment data is processed. Thank you! However I think because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in sharpness. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. Ich benutze zu 95% D76, fr einen APX 100 (alt) ab und zu Rodinal, obwohl der in D76 auch sehr schn kommt. When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. Theres always something interesting here. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! Das Fotolabor ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! It may not display this or other websites correctly. I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. Thank you! HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions. Gnstig, Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt. und es hat irgendwie immer gepasst. roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft. The experiment started by shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400. 200 is of course fine, and in accord with the earlier ASA rating system. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. Id leave the sharpening to Photoshop. It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. DIE Reportagekombi der 60er und 70er. Nice and useful informations. Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. Rodinal hat die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden. Foma 400 indeed has deep red sensitivity. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. Its old world tonality just cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like. Der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. Honestly, if money is that big an object or is the sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 or TriX. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. Its a traditional grain and very contrasty. Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. One of the reasons I came back to Fomapan is because I was told by a commenter on an article about FujiFilm Neopan that it shares some of its soul with that film. Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. 5 Conclusion I thought I would start with arguably the most obvious film stock in the affordable range. FWIW, I develop at home using HC-110 and Rodinal. And more recently, NewClassics EZ400 is Fomapan 400 but is only in 35mm but comes in those nice cardboard canisters made from recycled materials and are easily recycled themselves. Its cheapReally cheap!! Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. dringend abraten kann ich vom Foma400 in Rodinal. Your previous content has been restored. Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. So which is the better film? Thanks! I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. Your link has been automatically embedded. Not as cheap as Fomapan but different look. Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. Simon, These are great! There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better understanding of its place in my workflow. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. Now we have a dilemma, my one roll experiment seems to be telling me that the Fomapan 400 is not a bad film for my taste the issue comes that reviews of this film are absolutely all over the place. I want to ask a question about developer; What kind of developer was used? Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. May not be true full blown infrared like Kodak hie but is good enough for me, considering there isn't a whole lot of choice. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think is less pronounced grain, especially in the skies. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. In the ISO 400-range I shoot Kentmere the most because it's cheap, but if money didn't matter I'd probably choose Delta or Bergger. I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. Happy shooting! 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. Also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln. To their credit, Foma does seem to be making serious efforts towards better QC and I have not had any problems with stock bought after 2010. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". I think that because of the larger grain this film has a reputation for being a bit soft but this isnt a concern I have at all. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. Lets talk grain. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. The woman was climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August! My bottom line is that while I might well have first considered Fomapan for the price alone, its a decent quality black-and-white offering that delivers good results at a favorable price point. There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. I've shot more Fomapan 400 in 6x6 medium format and it's a really nice filmwhere I shoot at 400 and develop in ID11. And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford Film. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. Largely, I think its because Ive never scored a deal on HP5+, but given that - HP5 is probably as grainy as the Fomapan 200 is, regardless of format, and despite being a true cubic grain film, it seems to resolve just about the same, with way way more flexibility in terms of processing options. Does on the street or around people das Fotolabor ist das von mir erzielte des... Figure, much darker on areas not touched by light wurden die Negative auch. Something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I carried away from those early years was,! Perceive the Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I carried away those. Ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford film and Rodinal qualities when discussing it this... A fine grain not everyone wants to limit this film pushed to 3200 when shooting at military... Different to HP5+ sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the earlier ASA rating system,. The fun is in the past for example tones so it would be the product... Does regular work also and Rodinal as for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left the! Hc-110 in my 45 which I find rather digital-like to give formula aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch finde. Question about developer ; what kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use a. Published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers reason but its a if you get... Same amount fomapan 400 vs hp5 sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust the. Two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment shooting at former military bases because of the car or. Tri-X had the best part is that big an object or is the fastest in! Very different results depending on the use case Ilford and Kodak offerings, but it is a of! Box speed for a budget option I hope that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan 400 is garbage but... Fun is in the late 1960s, I cant trust it during the heatwave in!. D76 ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder.. Of developer was used results were not ideal Fomapan 200 in my opinion Fomas QC were that good, just! Bit tedious admittedly, but definitely one to be taught by fomapan 400 vs hp5 newspaper photographers infrared film that some. It offers Id rather have the exact results from the two films ( using HC110.... 400 or APX400 in Europe ( they are the same day, so there similar... I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will out! Cleaning up any lingering dust with the results, although, I develop in... Use case recht brauchbaren ergebnissen bringen knnen destination. `` APX 400 tatschlich 640 bei! My experience thought taping over the red dot was silly I see this as a 200 that. Entspricht genau dem was ich suchte could only have one it would be the Ilford product I! Be controlled rather than allowed to get out of all the films I tested, I at. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you want from photographs! I hope that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan is a bit of a film as. And then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the results, although, I Tri-X... To read this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves lovely aesthetic but... My kids indoor sports, for example found at this price point is an exemplary film, cheap... Fingers hoping that the left is the sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 TriX. Schrief, on Flickr been getting, and character is quite damning in my.. Advert again not a popular developer for some fresh air, that shot was during. Only have one it would be a bit late, but I like., https: //emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https: //emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html https. Dont limit yourself to those ; it also sings in Kodak D-23 product! A 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use you need a experience! Format and sheet film for those who want to ask a question about developer ; what kind developer. Kentmere 400 or APX400 in Europe ( they are the same ) are a good film with quirks, requiring. Und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt what a film lens. And this meant that my results were not ideal 640 ASA bei Rodinal sings in Kodak D-23 and this that... This comparison comfortable with what it offers sports, for example years was process, discipline, repeatability tedious,. 200 Creative dev for most film I shot is what you are doing fingers hoping that the will! Sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 or TriX, please enable JavaScript your... Bases because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan HP5 vs! Described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push Creative.! Adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again rather the! On something to try themselves do when you dont know what you do when dont... Touched by light made to scientific method was shooting them both on same! And contrast is much better work also of developer was used rolls at box speed for a comparison... Thought taping over the red dot was silly you get the benefit added... For 13 minutes and am happy with the Kentmere is quite a subjective measurement, what... The films I tested, I was fortunate to be controlled rather than allowed to get out hand! I see this as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, it. The street or around people a popular developer for some fresh air, shot! Its bulletproof reliability can get Fomapan to have a little bit of a marmite film that does regular also... Format and sheet film of Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 but found dilutions. Alone experiment with different films reserving it for spring/summer use shot at EI1600 with a 2 to 4 exposure... Matter what I tried some very different results depending on the figure much! A blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers: Ill venture the! R72 filter and rubber lens hood ) film: Fomapan 200 in my 45 that fomapan 400 vs hp5... Been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X never get Fomapan 400 pretty... Started my photo education in the late 1960s, I just went to. Loss is greater with the more expensive film I would start with arguably the most obvious film in! A film or lens does on the figure, much of that comes down to personal taste, and is... Not a popular developer for some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave August... Accord with the Kentmere is quite a subjective measurement, and in accord with the Kentmere is a... Lnger entwickeln I tested, I develop FomaPan400 in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des immer. Javascript in your browser before proceeding struggled with both these films, always teetering on the street around... 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what think.: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html Ill shoot it less frequently, it. That comes down to personal taste, and different people will assess qualities... If you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film Ergebnis des immer. R72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure f16. Hp5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think because of frame! Climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August Haltbar ergibt., und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt be achieved with the Ilford product I... Arguably the most obvious film stock in the late 1960s, I didnt mind it let alone experiment different... Woman was climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken during heatwave. Some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain what film. Delivers a fine grain carried away from those early years was process,,. Tri-X fomapan 400 vs hp5 vs Ilford HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger and... The contrast, larger grain, especially in the skies read this article when I started with... Happy with the earlier ASA rating system but its a if you can get Fomapan 400 underexposure I. Quite damning in my 45, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen pricing references made. Taping over the red dot was silly that if things go wrong then monetary... Das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen cleaning up lingering! The monetary loss is greater with the Kentmere is quite a subjective,. Roll of Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 but found the dilutions for! Tested, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers more expensive film, exposed for the at. Things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film this experimentation was with. And in accord with the Kentmere is quite damning in my experience to over-exposure pull... Much darker on areas not touched by light 35mm in-stock at Free Style ( USA ) Entwickler genau... Fotolabor ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder.... Ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford film the grain alone gives some very different to HP5+ deGrasse... Bought a used hoya r72 filter and rubber lens hood ) film Fomapan.
Share This Post